Wednesday, 13 May 2015

Picking Apart Glycemic Index: High Vs Low -PART VI-

Conclusion


The constant misconceptions on how weight loss occurs actually works has been going on forever. Based on the evidence provided, with my logical reasoning on the whole issue, rather than just picking a side I want to argue for, it becomes clearer to notice that in the grand scheme of things, glycemic index is meaningless for body composition purposes solely. Rather, pay more attention on eating less food, adequate protein intake, satiation duration, training, this is what will contribute towards your weight loss. Be aware that, by no means am I advocating eating fruit loops, and you will look unbelievable. If having a lean body is the ONLY importance in your mind than eat whatever carbohydrates you like, also this will only work SHORT-TERM. Please do not think I value eating crappy carbohydrates, I value the studies, make educated decisions based on the overall picture, that’s all! Another area I want to chime into, not too much, but it is someway related towards the glycemic index, carbohydrate choices, and overall food intake, which rather needs some clarity.  Many people believe in this phenomenon on magical macronutrient strategies making you lose weight. The answer is by lowering a macro that is contributing to your overall calorie intake and you lessen the amount of that given food, weight loss occurs, simple as that. Looking back at all that has been brought towards your attention, next time you tell others these common pseudo-scientific sayings: lower your carbs, eat veggies, organic, low glycemic, whatever else floats your boat. Avoid all this flawed information and focus on the truth. The truth is calories are a predictor whether a person gains or loses weight, not the glycemic index, or macronutrient strategies, and whatever else you think can help.  They all do matter, however they contribute to main focus.

No comments:

Post a Comment