Glycemic
index has been of controversy, in terms of being a useful guide towards helping
people lose weight. I won’t get into the whole origination of the glycemic
index, or what was the reasoning for its purpose, simple because I feel
everybody has heard something about it, and likely already factor it someway in
the choices of carbohydrates they choose. My objective here is to provide you
with the important points of my research, by giving you what is relevant, so
you are left pondering. Giving you something to think about on the changes you
need to consider to make, and how you can get your life back, (hint, hint, this
is what my blog is all about) by getting the actual facts based on credible
scientific research.
Insight on
Glycemic Index and My Rant
Before
I begin, I feel though, I should give you atleast something regarding the
glycemic index, and even if you never heard about it, than I encourage you to
please listen up. This would be a brief explanation just to stimulate our brains
to start thinking about the subject at hand more clearly. The glycemic index is
used to see how significantly and fast a given food causes levels of glucose in
the blood to rise. The belief was ALWAYS that low glycemic index keeps
us fuller, improves our blood sugar, and stimulates a low initial insulin
response due to improved insulin sensitivity. Sounds pretty much like an ideal
scenario for fat loss, which it is mind you. All of this is in fact true, that
the glycemic index do differ in glucose responses, and do indicate a difference
in insulin responses, meaning low glycemic having a lower glucose and insulin responses,
while high glycemic index have the opposite effect. The problem here is the ALWAYS word I mentioned
above. In fact studies actually show variances of both glucose and insulin
responses. Meaning by eating either low or high glycemic index carbohydrates, will not support what you think should happen, and what I actually mentioned above is not always the case. Also consider that some studies show low glycemic index do keep us
fuller, while other studies show no effect.
Ranting in General...
Glycemic Index
Here is my issue with the whole
problem, but also in this case the glycemic index, is giving your advice or
answers in absolutes. That everything happens only this particular way,
and the complete undermining of potential variances of responses is overlooked.
We have to understand all potential variables, and if you are not able to
understand that, than keep your advice general, but actually specify that, so
people don’t feel they now know what happens, yet really have no idea. Sorry
for the rant, getting off topic here, this is just something important for me
to share, so we all realize on how important is to educate people with the
correct information.
i always wondered why diets are so general u'd think they'd vary on peoples needs, what do you think about canada's food guide tho where they say if your this age you should eat this and that without regarding any othe variables?
ReplyDeleteHey Jack.
ReplyDeleteWell I will not really get into the whole debacle of canada's food guide. Yes I do think its a failure, once you look into the science of how certain foods are damaging once health. Mind you, Canada's food guide is advocating higher carbohydrate intake. Now we know majority of issues regards to cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, autoimmune, and many other pathologies tend to be linked/correlated with either eating too much carbs. Grains have undergone much research, and are a major culprit too. I do think the guide should be treated as nothing more than a guide. Eventually you need to make educated decisions. Hopefully, I can be of service to help make a change in peoples lives.